PDA

View Full Version : Setting up or selecting your first plane - what about range?


aeajr
02-24-2005, 01:54 PM
Your are trying to evaluate RTF packages, or you are looking for a new radio
package, or maybe you have a radio and want another receiver for your new
plane. Have you looked at the range specs? You should. In terms of range,
27 MHz vs. 72 MHz doesn't matter. You need to look at the rated range.

How much range is enough is always hard to say. In the RTF packages you have
no choice. It is what it is. Just be aware of it and don't push the limits.

In considering your range needs, a lot has to do with the size of your plane
and your flying area. If you are like me, you will likely use the whole field
if you can see your plane well enough to fly the whole field My field is 800'
X 1600'. This link will take you to a photo of our field.
http://www.lisf.org/Pictures/29070035.jpg

If your flying space is about the size of a couple of football/soccer fields,
side by side, Edge to edge you might be 350 feet. So, 500'/150 meters seems
like enough range. However, if this is a square space, corner to corner you
are right at the edge of that 500 foot receiver. A stray signal could cause
you a problem. I would want at least a 1000 foot rated range for that space,
if you are going to cover all of it, and you will. Otherwise, don't let it
get out that far. Be aware of your range.

HobbyZone, maker of the Aerobird and Firebird series of RTFs, recommends a
space of at least 600X600 for a new pilot for many of their planes. If it is
a square space then corner to corner it is 850 feet. You are near the edge of
a 1000 foot receiver. I would want at least 1500 foot rated range in order to
be able to fly the whole field.

I often fly my Aerobird, which has a 42" wingspan, beyond the end of the field
by flying over the trees at 300-400 feet altitude. I will admit that it
becomes pretty hard to see the plane's orientation at this range. I am
probably 1700 feet away at that point. The Aerobird has a rated 2500'
range. Never had a problem, but I am pushing it.

I have had my 2M, 78 inch wing span, and 3M, 120 inch wing span, sailplanes
up and out near the edge of visual range. I don't know how high or far away
they are but the 2 meter plane probably approaches 1/2 mile and the 3 Meter
plane can be flown beyond that. I just installed an altimeter to see how
high I am actually flying. For these planes I have now standardized on 1
mile+ rated receivers.

If you have your own radio, range is more a function of the receiver than the
transmitter. Your radio doesn't change, but your working range does, based on
what receiver you are using. So how much is enough. Here is my advice. Your
mileage will vary. When in doubt, go up a minimum and you can't go wrong. If
you field is know to have a lot of radio noise, go up a range. Working at
about 50% of the rated range of the receiver is probably a VERY safe rule.
Doesn't guarantee you won't have a problem from interference, it just reduces
the chances.

Here are some rough guidelines I would suggest when evaluating your receiver
or your RTF package. Your mileage will vary! These assume you can fly as far
out as you like, so they are based on how far you can probably comfortably see
the model and its orientation. My expectation is that you are actually flying
no more than 75% of this range.

500'/150 meters is good for indoor or for planes of 24 inch wing span or
smaller.

1000'/300 meters rated range should be OK for anything with a 32" wing or
smaller. At 750 feet, this plane will be getting small and hard to judge for
orientation. If you want to push this, go up a range.

2000'/600 meters should be safe for anything less than about 42 inches.

3000+ (.6 miles/1 KM) would be my minimum recommendation for a power plane
over 42 inches and up to about 70 inches or up to about 80 inches for a 2M
sailplane. Note that on sailplanes or e-gliders, with the motor turned off,
you
don't have the radio "noise" of a running glow or electric motor, so the
plane itself tends to be much quieter, from a radio "noise" point of view.

Many of the 72 MHz radio/receivers that are packaged with RTF sailplanes
planes have 3000'/1KM+ ratings and work fine for 2M sailplanes. I have flown
my 2M Spirit out to visual limits with a 72 MHz AM radio rated at 3000+' range
with no problems at all. However if you have a "noisy" environment, go up a
range. I have standardized on 1 mile/1.6KM rated receivers for all my 2M and
larger sailplanes.


Summary:

Range is more a feature of the receiver than the transmitter. More range is
always better. You may be able to get beyond the rated range of your
receiver, or you may start to "glitch" short of that range. The amount of
radio "noise" at your field, the orientation of your antenna in the plane and
radio noise generated by the plane itself will vary greatly. Ask the others
at your field what the experience has been. If you are flying alone at an
unknown location, keep it in close, within 50% of your rated range, and you
should be OK.

aeajr
10-29-2005, 05:25 AM
This is an old post but I wanted to bring it back.

Lately I have helped a number of new guys look at radios. Many of the radio makers are now packaging their radios with micro servos and micro receivers that are approprate for electric flyers. However SOME of these micro receivers have very limited ranges.

You MUST pay attention to the specs on the receivers.

For example the Futaba 6EXAS has a real nice package for about $160 that includes a micro receiver and servos. however the receiver only has a 650 range. While this is ok for small parkflyers or indoor planes, it would not be appropriate for a fast plane, a larger plane or a sailplane.

My flying field is 800X1600 so this receiver would not even let me safely fly across the narrow side of the field.

There is nothing wrong with short range receivers. GWS sells TONS of receivers with 500 foot ranges, but you must be aware of the limitations or you are going to get in trouble.

Let the flyer beware!

Quando
11-14-2005, 12:34 PM
HI aeajr, I am a newbe. I have only flown thoes little foam planes you get at toys r us. I just bought a T-Hawk, to learn on. I would like to buy a radio that would be good with a sim. and also will be able to meet my needs as I progress. Could you suggest a radio and a sim. that would meet these needs? I am willing to pay a little more to get good quality. THANKS Ray

aeajr
11-15-2005, 03:58 PM
HI aeajr, I am a newbe. I have only flown thoes little foam planes you get at toys r us. I just bought a T-Hawk, to learn on. I would like to buy a radio that would be good with a sim. and also will be able to meet my needs as I progress. Could you suggest a radio and a sim. that would meet these needs? I am willing to pay a little more to get good quality. THANKS Ray

Congratulations on a good choice in the T-hawk.

So, how much is a little more? It would also be good to know where you plan to go with your flying.

I will assume you want to be in the $200 or less range for a radio, micro receiver and micro servos. Here are three options.

Futaba 6 EXAS - $160
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXJUV7**&P=ML

Airtronics VG6000 $160
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXEUY5**&P=7

Hitec Optic 6 - Not available with micro servos and receiver that woudl work for small electrics, but you can go to Servo city and pick components.
I suggest 2-3 HS-55 or HS-81 servos, Electron 6, Micro 555 or O4MG receiver as good choices. You should be able to come in around $200
http://www.servocity.com/html/6-ch_optic_6_systems.html

If you have to go super cheap, this is better than a standard radio, but I wold say the others are better investments.

Futaba 4EXA - $140
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXKSB5**&P=ML

Quando
11-15-2005, 08:35 PM
Hey aeajr, I see you out there everwhere, helping everyone. You are a great guy, and I am sure everone appreciates all the help. I like your suggestions on a radio. I am leaning towards the optic 6. I plan on staying in this hoby for a long while and eventually do some aerobatics. What is your opinion on the E-SKY sim package with FMS, for about $40.00? Would I learn more quickly on an AFPD or G3 or the like? THANKS Ray

aeajr
11-16-2005, 05:38 AM
Thanks for the kind words Ray. I do try to help the new guys get started. A lot of people helped me, so I am just paying it forward, as they say. Besides, helping the new guys on the forums or at the field always teaches me new things.

As for a simulator, I use FMS to practice basic aerobatics, to get the feel of a new plane and, of course, to help new guys get comfortable with stick movement and flying toward themselves. As for the e-sky package, I don't know that software so I can't comment.

The higher priced sim packages are definately more detailed and can add things like wind and other conditions that FMS doesn't offer. So from that respect they may be more helpful. However I am not a BIG sim user and FMS does all that I need it to do.

In terms of radios, you might want to take a look at the new Spread Spectrum radio from Specktrm.

6 Channel computer radio with no channel conflict issues. It is new technology, but they have been using it for RC cars for a while so most of the inital bugs have been worked out. The airplane version is marketed toward electric pilots. At about 1 KM mile it has plenty of range for parkflyers and most electics. If you plan to get into sailplanes I don't see it as good for that type of flying.

Nice set of features, 10 memories and no more channel concerns as it auto detects and auto selects open channels in the 2.4 GHZ range. If you are a club flyer, you won't have to wait for a channel or worry about being shot down.

If you fly off field, you won't have to worry about some pilot that is 1/4 mile away shooting you down either. This is a problem with both 27 and 72 MHZ radios. Conflict causes crashes. Spread Spectrum solves this..

It comes with micro servos and micro receiver which are right for electrics. It is based on a JR radio and is backed by Horizon Hobby, so you can be confident of the service.

Take a look at this post:
http://forums.radiocontrolzone.com/showthread.php?t=207991

Quando
11-16-2005, 12:00 PM
aeajr thanks for the info, it is appreciated! Could you tell me what mode 1 and mode 2 is all about. Is one better than the other? Is one outdated and one current. Could you tell me what the standard or most used configuration is for the sticks on a radio? Thanks Much Ray

triflyer
11-17-2005, 01:06 AM
Aeajr-
I'm trying to decide on new receiver purchases. I use FM, non-computer style JR and Futaba radios of older vintage, with JR as my perferred system. I mostly fly scale WWI, 4 cycle powered planes in the 50"-70" wingspan range. I would like to put together a few more airborne packs, as it is not easy to remove receivers and servos from one these type planes to reinstall into another. I have a few RCD brand receivers along with JR and Futaba. I have read your info on ranges and I can't quite figure out how to determine the range listing of any of these receivers. I was once told that for the most part,any name brand normal sized receiver should have plenty of range capability. Is this true? Sould a rule of thumb be that the smaller the overall size of the receiver, the less range it might have? Would the JR 6000 have more range than the JR UL? Would the UL have proper range for the type of planes I fly? Do you have any ballpark suggestions as to how to determine a receivers potential range? It seems as if many manufacturers do not provide specs on receiver range.
Also, when figuring your typical flying visual range, say 800' away, and 300' high, would it be a range 1100 feet, or is altitude + distance away figured differently?
And one more question that has nagged me for years. I do fly mostly WWI airplanes, which normally have functional flying wires on them. I have come to the conclusion that these subtract potential range from the receiver antenna depending on overall lengths of the flying wires and configuration. Is this true? Which is the best way to configure the receiver antenna in relationship to the fly wires?
Thank you for any advice you might have,
Curt

aeajr
11-17-2005, 03:25 AM
aeajr thanks for the info, it is appreciated! Could you tell me what mode 1 and mode 2 is all about. Is one better than the other? Is one outdated and one current. Could you tell me what the standard or most used configuration is for the sticks on a radio? Thanks Much Ray

Mode 1 and mode 2 define which functions live on which stick.

In North America, Mode 2 is the standard. Pitch and roll on right stick. Speed and yaw on left stick.

For a R/E/T plane that would put R/E on right stick and throttle on left.
For a A/R/E/T plane that would put A/E on right stick and R/T on left.

Mode one puts different functions on each stick.

One is not better than the other, they are just different. Whichever is most commonly flown in your club, or in your country is what I would recommend you follow so that you can receive help from others and so you can hand over the radio to another flyer, if you choose, and he will know where the controls are.

I only fly mode 1.

Oh, on a single stick radio, pitch and roll are on the stick and throttle is usually on a slide or a switch on the left side somewhere.

hope that helps.

aeajr
11-17-2005, 03:46 AM
Aeajr-
I was once told that for the most part,any name brand normal sized receiver should have plenty of range capability. Is this true? Sould a rule of thumb be that the smaller the overall size of the receiver, the less range it might have? Would the JR 6000 have more range than the JR UL? Would the UL have proper range for the type of planes I fly? Do you have any ballpark suggestions as to how to determine a receivers potential range? It seems as if many manufacturers do not provide specs on receiver range.
Also, when figuring your typical flying visual range, say 800' away, and 300' high, would it be a range 1100 feet, or is altitude + distance away figured differently?
And one more question that has nagged me for years. I do fly mostly WWI airplanes, which normally have functional flying wires on them. I have come to the conclusion that these subtract potential range from the receiver antenna depending on overall lengths of the flying wires and configuration. Is this true? Which is the best way to configure the receiver antenna in relationship to the fly wires?
Thank you for any advice you might have,
Curt

Can't help you on the flying wires and range. However the receivers I suggest below have such long range I would not worry about it. If you pass normal range check, you should be fine.

Hitec Futaba, GWS, Berg, FMA and many others publish ranges for all their receivers. I have not seen specs published for JR or airtroncis so I don't know what ranges they claim, but I won't buy a receiver of any kind that does not have a published range.

I have a Futaba 9C and Hitec Prism 7X computer radios. I fly almost all Hitec receivers. The Hitec Feather has a publishe range of 1000 feet and is the only Hitec FM of current vintage that has a range of under 1 mile. All the other Hitec receivers have 1 mile ranges.

A couple of the Futabas have ranges of under 1000 feet, but these are newer micro receivers targeted at the small electric market.

While many of the tiny receivers sold for the parkflyer market have shorter ranges, some as short as 300 feet, you can tell nothing about the range of a receiver by its physical size, so don't go by that at all.

I don't know if Hitec bought RCD, or it was one of their brands, but many of the Hitec receivers have RCD as part of their name. The web site is www.hitecrcd.com

If you have had good luck with JR, I would stay with them for your JR radio. Their full size receivers are almost sure to have plenty of range but I can't say for sure.

Among the receivers I use, for your planes I would recommend the Hitec Supreme 8 receiver. You are flying big planes where size and weight are not an issue. The Supreme sells for about $45 plus crystal and is solid as a rock in gas, glow, electic or sailplane applications. I fly the Supreme 8 in my larger 6-7 channel sailplanes and often fly them out 3/4 of a mile and 1000+ feet up so I know its range is solid. Never had a problem.

If you need to fit a receiver in a tight space, the Hitec Electron 6 is a six channel micro receiver with 1 mile range and rock solid performance. I also fly this at great distances in sailplanes.

Both are availalbe in Pos JR/Airtronics shift and Hitec/Futaba neg shift for the North American Market.

As far as range to the plane, it is simple geometry of a right triangle. With either of these receivers, you won't have to worry about it. :D

triflyer
11-17-2005, 04:09 AM
I really appreciate the info. You have really provided me with the info I needed and cleared up some incorrect conclusions. I have looked at both of the Hitec receivers that you mention and wondered if they were sufficent. I guess I know what I will get now.
Thanks again for the helpful advice.
Curt