paulriseborough
12-23-2001, 02:00 AM
Something I've noticed with a few of my slow-fly/indoor aerobatic models is the significant reduction in aileron effectiveness at low speeds. Are any of you aware of any reasearch/tests that have been done to determine effective means of re-energising the boundary layer of symmetrical wing sections operating at low <60000 Reynolds numbers?
I have experimented with thinning the wing section, but the stall was abrupt and Cl max reduced. Larger chord ailerons also seem to help, but the addition of turbulator strips seemed to have unpredictable effects (good on some days and bad on others)
My next wing will have the leading edge shape held by stringers rather than 1/32 sheet.
I suspect that the optimum position and size of boundary layer energisers is different with an aileron wing because of the abrupt change in camber at the aileron hinge location with a deflected aileron.
Has anyone done any work looking at the different types of symmetrical wing sections, ie where is the best chordwise location for maximum thickness for best lift and is this in conflict with the best location for effective aileron operation?
Lots of questions ........ oh for some flow visualisation.
Regards,
Paul
I have experimented with thinning the wing section, but the stall was abrupt and Cl max reduced. Larger chord ailerons also seem to help, but the addition of turbulator strips seemed to have unpredictable effects (good on some days and bad on others)
My next wing will have the leading edge shape held by stringers rather than 1/32 sheet.
I suspect that the optimum position and size of boundary layer energisers is different with an aileron wing because of the abrupt change in camber at the aileron hinge location with a deflected aileron.
Has anyone done any work looking at the different types of symmetrical wing sections, ie where is the best chordwise location for maximum thickness for best lift and is this in conflict with the best location for effective aileron operation?
Lots of questions ........ oh for some flow visualisation.
Regards,
Paul